wha?

i agree with the Court's decision, but who'da thunk that Justices Thomas, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer and Scalia would have agreed on this? i thought it'd be either 5-4 the other way, ruling that a warrant wasn't required, or that it'd be 8-1 affirming that it was required (with Rehnquist being the lone dissenter, mainly because he's dead and other Justices haven't figured it out yet).

it's mindboggling.